Williams v. Firequench, Inc.
- Paul Engelmayer
- 1:21-cv-04112
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 13
Williams v. Firequench, Judge Engelmayer awarded damages after a default, reduced fees, and reopened limited discovery to decide part of Williams’s backpay.
Shatoya Williams received an award of $105,722.55 plus the specified interest, while Firequench, Inc. remained liable under the default judgment. Both parties were required to participate in limited discovery concerning the disputed period of backpay.
What happened
In Williams v. Firequench, Inc., the court had already found Firequench liable by default in Williams’s employment-discrimination case. A magistrate judge recommended $142,421.45 in damages, including backpay, emotional-distress damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs, plus interest.
Firequench objected to backpay for the period after Williams left her handyman job during the COVID-19 pandemic and challenged the recommended attorneys’ fees. It argued that Williams had not adequately shown that she left because of unsafe working conditions or that she tried to reduce her losses by seeking other work.
Judge Engelmayer awarded Williams $105,722.55, plus specified pre-judgment and post-judgment interest. He adopted the recommended damages except for the disputed backpay period, reduced compensation for 1.6 hours of administrative work to a paralegal rate, and ordered limited discovery about Williams’s resignation, mitigation efforts, and job duties before deciding that portion of backpay.
The detailed version
- Williams v. Firequench, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-04112
- Paul Engelmayer
- July 21, 2023
Background
Shatoya Williams alleged that Firequench, Inc., doing business as Firetronics, failed to hire or stopped considering her for a fire alarm technician position because of her sex or gender. She alleged that Firequench employees told or indicated that she would not be hired because of her gender. Her claims arose under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law.
Firequench did not respond to the complaint or appear in the case. The court therefore entered a default judgment establishing liability and referred the case to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott for a damages proceeding. Judge Cott recommended $142,421.45: $90,930.79 in backpay, $30,000 in emotional-distress damages, $20,900 in attorneys’ fees, and $590.66 in costs, along with pre-judgment interest on backpay and post-judgment interest on all awarded sums.
Firequench later appeared and moved to set aside the default judgment. The court denied that motion after finding that all three relevant factors—whether the default was intentional, whether Firequench had a potentially valid defense, and whether setting aside the default would harm Williams—weighed against Firequench. Firequench appealed that decision but later withdrew the appeal. The district court then considered Firequench’s objections to the damages recommendation.
Objections to Backpay
Firequench challenged the recommended $36,538.90 in backpay for March 17 through December 6, 2020, after Williams resigned from her handyman job with AKAM. Firequench argued that Williams left for personal reasons rather than because of unsafe COVID-19 workplace conditions and that she had not made adequate efforts to find replacement work. It also argued that her job may have been nonessential under an executive order.
Williams stated that she had interacted with building tenants who had tested positive for COVID-19 and that AKAM had provided no personal protective equipment or social-distancing policy. She disputed Firequench’s account and stated that AKAM considered her an essential worker.
The court found the existing record insufficient to reliably determine why Williams resigned, whether her mitigation efforts were adequate, and whether her AKAM work was essential or nonessential. The court therefore reopened the damages proceeding for limited discovery on those subjects. It did not adopt the Report and Recommendation’s proposed $36,538.90 award for that period at that time.
Objections to Attorneys’ Fees
Firequench also argued that the recommended $20,900 fee award was excessive, pointing generally to work it characterized as administrative or paralegal work. The court found this objection cursory and nonspecific, and its own review did not identify widespread unreasonable billing.
The court nevertheless modified the fee calculation for 1.6 hours spent on administrative tasks. Instead of awarding those hours at the recommended junior-associate rate of $200 per hour, the court awarded them at a paralegal rate of $100 per hour. The resulting attorneys’ fee award was $20,740. The court also stated that Williams could seek additional fees for work connected with the limited discovery.
Ruling and Amount Awarded
Judge Engelmayer adopted the portions of Judge Cott’s recommendation to which Firequench had not objected and resolved the fee objection as described above. The court awarded Williams $105,722.55: $54,391.89 in backpay, $30,000 in emotional-distress damages, $20,740 in attorneys’ fees, and $590.66 in costs. The award also included pre-judgment interest on the backpay and post-judgment interest on all sums, beginning when the Clerk of Court enters judgment and continuing until payment.
The case was ordered to proceed with expedited, limited discovery concerning Williams’s March 16, 2020 resignation from AKAM, her efforts to reduce her losses between March 16 and December 6, 2020, and her AKAM job responsibilities. The court directed the parties to submit a case-management plan and later provide limited briefing on those issues.
Read the full 13-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.