Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 24, 2023

Johnson v. City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-05279
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Johnson v. City of New York, Judge Swain dismissed the duplicate lawsuit without prejudice and waived its filing fee.

Who this affects

Glenn Johnson, the Clerk of Court, and the Warden of the Vernon C. Bain Center; the dismissal leaves Johnson’s pending action under docket number 1:23-CV-5264 (VSB) unaffected.

What happened

Johnson v. City of New York involved Glenn Johnson’s lawsuit claiming violations of his federal constitutional rights and state law. He filed the case without a lawyer while held at the Vernon C. Bain Center.

The court found that Johnson had submitted the same complaint in another case pending before Judge Vernon S. Broderick under docket number 1:23-CV-5264. Because the lawsuits raised the same claims, the court said there was no useful purpose in continuing this duplicate case.

Judge Swain dismissed this action without prejudice as duplicative, directed that Johnson not be charged the $350 filing fee, and ordered judgment entered. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying court costs, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Johnson v. City of New York · No. 1:23-cv-05279
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 24, 2023

Background

Glenn Johnson filed this action without a lawyer while he was held in the Vernon C. Bain Center. The opinion says he asserted claims alleging violations of federal constitutional rights and claims under state law.

Reason for dismissal

Johnson submitted a complaint identical to the complaint in another action pending before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York under docket number 1:23-CV-5264 (VSB). Because the two actions raised the same claims, the court concluded that litigating this duplicate lawsuit would serve no useful purpose.

Ruling

The court dismissed this action without prejudice as duplicative of the pending action. The court also directed the Clerk of Court not to charge Johnson the $350 filing fee for this action, and directed that funds not be deducted or encumbered from his prison trust-fund account for this action.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying court costs. It also directed the Clerk to enter judgment and send copies of the order and judgment to Johnson and the Warden of the Vernon C. Bain Center.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.