Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 27, 2023

Moshir v. Independent and Globalist Political Party of United States of America…

Full caption

Moshir v. Independent and Globalist Political Party of United States of America Incorporated

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-05429
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Judge Swain dismissed Moshir v. Independent and Globalist Political Party as frivolous because the complaint was unintelligible.

Who this affects

Al Moshir's action was dismissed at the court's required screening of a complaint filed without a lawyer; the opinion does not identify clear claims or requested relief against the defendants.

What happened

In Moshir v. Independent and Globalist Political Party of United States of America Incorporated, Al Moshir filed the case without a lawyer and was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees. The court found that the handwritten complaint was largely unreadable and did not clearly identify the people or entities being sued, the events involved, the legal claims, or the requested relief.

The court concluded that the complaint was irrational and frivolous, meaning it had no reasonable basis in fact or law. It also found that the problems could not be fixed by rewriting the complaint, so it did not give Moshir permission to amend it.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action as frivolous, directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment, and denied Moshir permission to proceed without paying fees on appeal because the court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Moshir v. Independent and Globalist Political Party of United States of America… · No. 1:23-cv-05429
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 27, 2023

Background

Al Moshir brought the action without a lawyer. The court had previously allowed him to proceed without prepaying filing fees. The complaint was handwritten and included illegible writing in the margins. The court stated that it was unclear who Moshir intended to sue, what happened, what legal claims he sought to bring, and what relief he wanted. The opinion reproduces one of the complaint's statements and describes the rest of the complaint as similarly indecipherable.

Court’s analysis

Because Moshir was proceeding without prepaying filing fees, the court was required to screen the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). That law requires dismissal of a complaint that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks money from a defendant protected from that type of relief. The court also noted that it must dismiss a case when it lacks authority to hear the claims.

The court considered the complaint even under the more forgiving standard applied to filings by people without lawyers. It nevertheless found that the claims were irrational and that the complaint did not provide a legal theory, facts describing what happened, or a clear statement of the defendants or requested relief. The court therefore found dismissal for frivolousness warranted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint as frivolous. Although courts generally give a self-represented plaintiff an opportunity to amend a defective complaint, the court declined to do so because it found that the defects could not be cured by amendment. The court directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment. It also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.