Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 8, 2023

Williams v. Food Bank Company

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-06933
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Williams v. Food Bank Company, Chief Judge Swain ordered payment of the filing fees or submission of an IFP application within 30 days.

Who this affects

Rahjeem Williams, who must either pay $402 in fees or submit a signed IFP application within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

Rahjeem Williams v. Food Bank Company is a case brought by Williams without a lawyer. Williams submitted a complaint but did not pay the required fees or provide an application to proceed without paying them upfront.

The court ordered Williams, within 30 days, either to pay $402 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepayment. No summons would be issued at that time, and the action would be dismissed if Williams did not comply.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. This order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. Food Bank Company · No. 1:23-cv-06933
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 8, 2023

Background

Rahjeem Williams brought this civil action pro se, meaning without a lawyer. Williams submitted the complaint without paying the required filing fees and without submitting an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which means proceeding without paying fees in advance.

Order

The court explained that starting a civil action required either payment of $402—consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or submission of a signed IFP application under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court ordered Williams to take one of those steps within 30 days of the order. If Williams submitted an IFP application and the court granted it, Williams could proceed without prepaying the fees.

No summons would issue at that time. The case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Williams complied. If Williams failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal ruling and effect

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order addressed filing requirements and did not decide the merits of Williams’s claims against Food Bank Company or the other defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.