Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 9, 2023

Ahmed v. John/Jane Doe

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-05756
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ahmed v. John/Jane Doe, Judge Swain dismissed the petition without prejudice because Ahmed neither paid the fee nor filed a fee-waiver request.

Who this affects

Amar Ahmed, whose petition was dismissed without prejudice for failing to pay the filing fee or submit the required application to proceed without paying it.

What happened

In Ahmed v. John/Jane Doe, the court had ordered Amar Ahmed to pay the $5 filing fee for his petition or submit a request to proceed without paying it. The court gave him thirty days to comply.

Ahmed did neither. The order therefore dismissed his petition without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling. The order does not address whether the petition’s underlying claims had merit.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Ahmed permission to appeal without paying the fee. The clerk was directed to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ahmed v. John/Jane Doe · No. 1:23-cv-05756
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 9, 2023

Background

Amar Ahmed filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On July 6, 2023, the court ordered Ahmed, within thirty days, either to submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee or to pay the $5 fee required to file the petition. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Ruling

The court found that Ahmed had not submitted the application or paid the fee. Judge Laura Taylor Swain therefore dismissed the petition without prejudice. This disposition was based on Ahmed’s failure to satisfy the filing requirement; the order does not decide the merits of the petition.

Appeal and Case Status

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fee. The clerk was directed to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.