Moshir v. The related involving as perpetrators of mentions address through the…
Moshir v. The related involving as perpetrators of mentions address through the two (2) App U.S.A. Inc.
- Laura Swain
- 1:23-cv-07641
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
Moshir v. The Related Involving As Perpetrators of Mentions: Judge Swain ordered payment or a completed fee-waiver application within 30 days.
Ali Moshir, the plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, must either pay the required fees or submit a completed fee-waiver application for the case to proceed.
What happened
In Moshir v. The Related Involving As Perpetrators of Mentions, Ali Moshir filed the case without a lawyer and submitted an incomplete application to proceed without paying court fees.
The court ordered Moshir, within 30 days, either to pay $402 or submit a completed application labeled with the case number. The court will not issue a summons yet, and it said the action will be dismissed if Moshir does not comply.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.
The detailed version
- Moshir v. The related involving as perpetrators of mentions address through the… · No. 1:23-cv-07641
- Laura Swain
- Aug. 29, 2023
Background
Ali Moshir brought this action without a lawyer. To proceed with a civil action, a plaintiff must either pay $402 in filing and administrative fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. Moshir submitted an application, but he did not answer any of its questions.
Order
The court ordered Moshir, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $402 in fees or submit an amended application. The amended application must include docket number 23-CV-7641. The court directed that no summons issue at that time. It stated that, if Moshir complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures, but if he does not comply within the allowed period, the action will be dismissed.
Appeal-related ruling
The court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the merits of Moshir’s claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.