Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 30, 2023

Frazier v. Town of Islip Housing Authority

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-07518
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Frazier v. Town of Islip Housing Authority, Judge Swain transferred the housing-rights action to the Eastern District of New York for improper venue.

Who this affects

Cinqueta Frazier and the Town of Islip Housing Authority; the action was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York.

What happened

Cinqueta Frazier, representing herself, filed a letter alleging that the Town of Islip Housing Authority violated her housing-related rights in Central Islip, New York. The court noted that the letter was unsigned and did not include filing fees or a request to proceed without prepaying fees.

Judge Swain found that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York because the alleged events occurred in Suffolk County, which is in the Eastern District of New York, and nothing in the filing suggested that the defendant was located in the Southern District. The court therefore transferred the action rather than dismissing it.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the Clerk to transfer the action to the Eastern District of New York. The Southern District case was closed, no summons would issue there, and the transferee court would decide whether Frazier could proceed without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Frazier v. Town of Islip Housing Authority · No. 1:23-cv-07518
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 30, 2023

Background

Cinqueta Frazier, proceeding without a lawyer, filed a letter alleging that the Town of Islip Housing Authority violated her rights concerning housing in Central Islip, New York. The Clerk opened the letter as a new civil action. The letter was unsigned and was not accompanied by filing fees or a request to proceed without prepaying fees.

Venue analysis

Venue determines the proper federal district for a civil action. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), venue may generally lie where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority. Frazier did not allege the defendant’s residence, but she stated that the events underlying her claims occurred in Central Islip, Suffolk County. Suffolk County is in the Eastern District of New York, not the Southern District of New York.

The court concluded that nothing in Frazier’s submission showed that the defendant was located in the Southern District or that the events occurred there. Venue was therefore not proper in the Southern District under § 1391(b)(1) or (2).

Ruling

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), when a case is filed in the wrong venue, the court may dismiss it or, in the interest of justice, transfer it to a district where it could have been brought. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The order closed the case in the Southern District, directed that no summons issue from that court, and left the decision about whether Frazier could proceed without prepaying fees to the transferee court.

The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.