Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 7, 2023

Robinson v. Annucci

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-06924
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Robinson v. Annucci, Judge Swain dismissed Robinson’s unauthorized action without prejudice and ordered that no filing fee be charged.

Who this affects

Stephen Robinson was released from this action without being charged the $350 filing fee, and any previously authorized deductions from his prison trust account for this lawsuit were ordered suspended. The dismissal was without prejudice, and permission to appeal without paying the appellate fee was denied.

What happened

In Robinson v. Annucci, Stephen Robinson was listed as a plaintiff in a complaint filed by Bryon K. Brown and 28 other people about an allegedly denied religious service at Sing Sing Correctional Facility. Robinson had not signed the complaint or otherwise indicated that he wanted to pursue its claims.

The court asked Robinson to sign the complaint and either pay the filing fee or apply to proceed without paying it. Robinson responded that he had not authorized the lawsuit and that his name had been used without permission. He asked the court to remove his name from the action.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain granted Robinson’s request to withdraw the action and dismissed the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), without prejudice to a later action about the incident. The court also directed that Robinson not be charged the filing fee and denied permission to appeal without paying the appellate fee.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Robinson v. Annucci · No. 1:23-cv-06924
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 7, 2023

Background

The court opened this action after Stephen Robinson was listed as a plaintiff in a complaint filed by Bryon K. Brown and 28 other individuals. That complaint concerned the alleged denial of a religious service at Sing Sing Correctional Facility on April 14, 2023. Robinson did not sign the complaint or otherwise indicate that he intended to litigate the claims in it.

The court initially assumed that Robinson intended to pursue those claims. It directed him to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without paying it and a prisoner authorization for fee deductions. It also directed him to sign and resubmit the signature page of the complaint.

Robinson then wrote to the court that he had not signed the lawsuit, had been unaware of it, and believed his name had been used without permission because he had filed a grievance about being denied a religious service. He asked the court to remove his name from the action.

Ruling

The court granted Robinson’s request to withdraw the action, stating that he had not authorized it to be filed. It dismissed the complaint under Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, without prejudice to any action Robinson might seek to file concerning the incident described in the earlier complaint. The court did not decide the underlying allegation about the religious service.

The court directed the Clerk of Court not to charge Robinson the $350 filing fee and directed the official having custody of Robinson to suspend any previously authorized deduction from his prison trust account for this lawsuit. It also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the appellate fee. The Clerk was directed to terminate the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.