Copeland v. Warden
- Laura Swain
- 1:23-cv-08495
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Copeland v. Warden, Chief Judge Swain ordered Johnathan Copeland to pay filing fees or submit a complete IFP application.
Johnathan Copeland, the incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit a complete IFP application and prisoner authorization for the case to proceed.
What happened
In Copeland v. Warden, Johnathan Copeland, who is incarcerated and representing himself, filed a civil action with an incomplete application to proceed without paying fees upfront. The missing page lacked his signature.
The court gave Copeland 30 days to either pay $402 in fees or submit the attached, completed application and a prisoner authorization. If approved, the $350 filing fee would be collected from his account in installments; the $52 administrative fee would not apply.
The court said no summons would issue yet and warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the action. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without prepayment of fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Copeland v. Warden · No. 1:23-cv-08495
- Laura Swain
- Sept. 27, 2023
Background
Johnathan Copeland filed this civil action while incarcerated at Otis Bantum Correctional Center on Rikers Island and representing himself. He submitted an incomplete application to proceed without prepaying court fees; the application was missing its second page and his signature.
Fee or application requirement
The court ordered Copeland, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay the required $402 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee, or submit a completed application to proceed without prepayment of fees, commonly called an IFP application, along with a prisoner authorization.
The prisoner authorization would allow the court to direct the correctional facility to deduct the $350 filing fee from Copeland’s account in installments and provide the court with certified account statements for the preceding six months. The court explained that the $52 administrative fee does not apply to a prisoner who is granted IFP status. Any submitted application had to identify docket number 23-CV-8495 (LTS).
Ruling and effect
The court ordered Copeland to pay the fees or submit the required materials. No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that, if Copeland complied, the Clerk’s Office would process the case under its procedures; if he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.
Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order also cautioned that a later dismissal of a prisoner’s action as frivolous or for failure to state a claim could count as a statutory “strike,” but this order did not decide the merits of Copeland’s claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.