Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 3, 2023

Burns v. County of Westchester

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-08659
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Burns v. County of Westchester, Judge Swain denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees and dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the prisoner three-strikes rule.

Who this affects

George Burns’s ability to file this action without prepaying the filing fee; the complaint was dismissed without prejudice, and he may start a new action by paying the fee.

What happened

In Burns v. County of Westchester, George Burns, who was incarcerated at Westchester County Jail and represented himself, sued the County of Westchester and asked to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

The court said Burns had three prior qualifying dismissals, so federal law generally barred him from filing a new case without paying the fee while incarcerated. The court also found that his complaint did not show an immediate danger of serious physical injury.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied Burns’s request to proceed without prepaying fees and dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the prisoner three-strikes rule. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal, while noting that Burns could start a new action by paying the filing fee.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Burns v. County of Westchester · No. 1:23-cv-08659
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 3, 2023

Background

George Burns, who was incarcerated at Westchester County Jail, brought this action without a lawyer. He alleged that the facility was improperly exercising its discretion to impose fines for disciplinary proceedings because of a budget shortfall. Burns asked to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without prepaying the filing fee.

Three-strikes rule

The court held that Burns was barred by the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s three-strikes rule, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), from filing a new civil action without prepaying fees while he was a prisoner. The court relied on three prior qualifying dismissals. The statute permits an exception when a prisoner alleges an imminent danger of serious physical injury, but the court found that Burns’s complaint did not show such a danger. The court explained that the danger must exist when the complaint is filed.

Disposition

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied Burns’s request to proceed without prepaying fees, and the complaint was dismissed without prejudice under the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s three-strikes rule. The court stated that Burns could begin a new action by paying the filing fee, after which the complaint would be reviewed under the prisoner-screening statute. Burns remained barred from proceeding without prepaying fees in future actions while incarcerated unless he alleged an imminent threat of serious physical injury.

The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.