Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 13, 2023

Loeb & Loeb LLP v. Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:23-cv-08993
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Loeb & Loeb LLP v. Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., Judge Torres set deadlines for confirming an arbitration award and serving respondents.

Who this affects

Loeb & Loeb LLP must meet the filing, service, and proof-of-service deadlines. Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. and Unicorn Global, Inc. must respond to the petition by the stated deadline.

What happened

In Loeb & Loeb LLP v. Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. against Unicorn Global, Inc., Loeb & Loeb LLP asked the court to confirm an arbitration award.

The court treated the confirmation proceeding like a request for summary judgment and set deadlines for the parties to submit statements, supporting materials, opposition papers, and a reply.

Judge Torres also required Loeb & Loeb LLP to personally serve the petition and order on the respondents and file proof of service. The order did not decide whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Loeb & Loeb LLP v. Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. · No. 1:23-cv-08993
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Oct. 13, 2023

Background

On October 12, 2023, Loeb & Loeb LLP filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment.

Order

The court ordered Loeb & Loeb LLP to file and serve a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1 and any additional supporting materials by November 16, 2023. Those materials could include legal memoranda, the arbitration award, supporting documents, and affidavits or declarations stating that exhibits were true and correct copies.

The respondents were ordered to file opposition papers by December 7, 2023. Loeb & Loeb LLP could file a reply by December 21, 2023.

The court also ordered Loeb & Loeb LLP to personally serve a copy of the petition and the order on the respondents by November 2, 2023, using a person authorized under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 311. Loeb & Loeb LLP was required to file an affidavit proving service by November 9, 2023.

Disposition

Judge Analisa Torres issued a scheduling and service order. The opinion did not decide whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.