Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 1, 2023

Shire LLC v. Meijer, Inc.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:23-cv-10479
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Shire LLC v. Meyjer, Judge Torres ordered briefing and service steps for a petition seeking confirmation of an arbitration award.

Who this affects

Shire LLC and Shire U'S., Inc. must provide supporting materials, serve the petition and order, and file proof of service. Meyjer, Inc. and Meijer Distributions, Inc. may oppose the petition by the deadline set by the court.

What happened

Shire LLC and Shire U'S., Inc. asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Meyjer, Inc. and Meijer Distributions, Inc.

The court directed the petitioners to file supporting materials and a statement of facts, directed the respondents to file an opposition, and set a deadline for any reply. The court also required the petitioners to serve the petition and order on the respondents and file proof of service.

Judge Analisa Torres did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award. She issued deadlines and service requirements for the case to proceed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shire LLC v. Meijer, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-10479
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Dec. 1, 2023

Background

On November 30, 2023, Shire LLC and Shire U'S., Inc. filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The court explained that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment, meaning the parties must support their positions with relevant materials and evidence.

Court’s order

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1 and additional supporting materials by December 22, 2023. Those materials were to include the arbitration award, supporting documents, and affidavits or declarations stating that the exhibits were true and correct copies.

The respondents were ordered to file any opposition by January 12, 2024. The petitioners could file a reply by January 26, 2024.

The court separately required the petitioners to serve the petition and the order on the respondents by December 15, 2023, using the methods identified in New York law. The petitioners also had to file an affidavit confirming service by December 20, 2023.

Result

Judge Analisa Torres issued case-management and service instructions. The order did not decide whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.