Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 16, 2023

Burns v. Sabrina

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-09085
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Burns v. Sabrina, Judge Swain denied Burns’s request to proceed without paying filing fees and dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the PLRA’s three-strikes rule.

Who this affects

George Burns, whose request to proceed without paying the filing fee was denied and whose complaint was dismissed without prejudice; Nicole Sabrina, the named defendant; and Burns’s ability to file future actions without paying fees while incarcerated.

What happened

In Burns v. Sabrina, George Burns, who is incarcerated at Westchester County Jail and representing himself, sued Nicole Sabrina, identified as a Legal Aid Society of Westchester attorney. He alleged that Sabrina failed to protect his rights and sought damages, declarations, and an injunction.

Burns had not prepaid the filing fee and asked to proceed without paying it. The court said he was barred by the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s three-strikes rule from filing a new case without paying while incarcerated, unless he showed an imminent danger of serious physical injury. The complaint did not make that showing.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied Burns’s request to proceed without paying the filing fee and dismissed the complaint without prejudice. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying fees and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Burns v. Sabrina · No. 1:23-cv-09085
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 16, 2023

Background

George Burns, who was incarcerated at Westchester County Jail, filed this action without a lawyer. He had not prepaid the filing fee and asked to proceed without paying it. The complaint named Nicole Sabrina, identified in the caption as a Legal Aid Society of Westchester attorney, and alleged that she failed to protect Burns’s rights. Burns sought compensatory and punitive damages, declaratory relief, and injunctive relief.

Three-strikes rule

The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides that a prisoner may not bring a federal civil action without paying the filing fee if, on three or more prior occasions while incarcerated or detained, the prisoner brought an action or appeal that was dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim, unless the prisoner faces an imminent danger of serious physical injury. The court relied on an earlier order stating that Burns was barred from filing new actions without paying the filing fee while he was a prisoner.

The court concluded that Burns’s complaint did not show an imminent danger of serious physical injury. The court therefore held that the three-strikes rule barred Burns from proceeding without paying the filing fee.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied Burns’s request to proceed without paying the filing fee and dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the three-strikes rule. The order states that Burns may start a new action by paying the filing fee; any such complaint would then be reviewed under the statutory screening requirement for prisoner civil-rights complaints. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Burns permission to appeal without paying fees. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment.

The order resolved the filing-fee issue and the case’s disposition without deciding whether Burns’s allegations against Sabrina stated a valid underlying claim.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.