Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 19, 2023

Rodriguez v. Camba

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-08784
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Rodriguez v. Camba, Judge Swain transferred the action to Brooklyn because the alleged events, witnesses, and documents were expected to be there.

Who this affects

Jaime L. Rodriguez’s case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York; the order did not decide his claims against CAMBA Housing Ventures or the Brooklyn Housing Court.

What happened

In Rodriguez v. Camba, Jaime L. Rodriguez, representing himself, sued CAMBA Housing Ventures and the Brooklyn Housing Court. He alleged violations of his federal constitutional rights and state-law claims, seeking damages and an order requiring action.

The court found that the Eastern District of New York was a proper and more convenient venue because Rodriguez’s allegations concerned his eviction from CAMBA housing in Brooklyn. The court also expected relevant witnesses and documents to be located there.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the case transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The Southern District case was closed, summonses were not issued there, and the receiving court was left to decide whether Rodriguez could proceed without paying filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rodriguez v. Camba · No. 1:23-cv-08784
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 19, 2023

Background

Jaime L. Rodriguez, who was being held on Rikers Island and represented himself, filed an action alleging that the defendants violated his federal constitutional rights. The court understood the complaint to name CAMBA Housing Ventures and the New York City Civil Court, Kings County, Housing Part, referred to as the Brooklyn Housing Court. Rodriguez sought damages and injunctive relief, and the court understood him to assert claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law.

Venue Analysis

Venue rules identify the federal district where a case may be litigated. The court explained that venue could be proper where a defendant resides or where a substantial part of the events underlying the claims occurred. Based on Rodriguez’s allegations about his eviction from CAMBA housing in Brooklyn, the court concluded that the Eastern District of New York was a proper venue. The court said the Southern District of New York might also be proper because CAMBA may reside there, but the alleged events occurred in Brooklyn.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), a federal court may transfer a case to another proper federal district for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The court determined that transfer to the Eastern District of New York was appropriate because many, if not all, of the underlying events allegedly occurred in Brooklyn, and relevant documents and witnesses could reasonably be expected to be there.

Disposition

The court directed the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The court did not decide the merits of Rodriguez’s claims. It stated that the receiving court would decide whether Rodriguez could proceed without prepaying fees, and it ordered that summonses would not issue from the Southern District of New York. The order closed the action in that court. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.