Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 8, 2023

Anastasio v. Bardolino Pizza Inc.

Judge
Ona Wang
Docket
1:22-cv-00192
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Anastasio v. Bardolino Pizza Inc., Judge Wang found the proposed settlement fair and reasonable, granted counsel Ramsha Ansari’s withdrawal, and ordered the case closed.

Who this affects

The parties to the proposed settlement, Ramsha Ansari as the attorney seeking withdrawal, and the case, which the Clerk was directed to close.

What happened

In Anastasio v. Bardolino Pizza Inc., the court reviewed the parties’ proposed settlement. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

The court found the proposed settlement fair and reasonable. It also granted Ramsha Ansari’s motion to withdraw as the attorney and directed the Clerk to close that motion and then close the case.

Judge Ona T. Wang issued the November 8, 2023 order approving the settlement as fair and reasonable, granting the withdrawal motion, and directing closure of the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Anastasio v. Bardolino Pizza Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-00192
Judge
Ona Wang
Date
Nov. 8, 2023

Background

The court reviewed the parties’ settlement submission under the procedure described in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or provide the settlement’s terms.

Rulings

The court found that the proposed settlement was fair and reasonable. It granted Plaintiff’s motion for Ramsha Ansari to withdraw as attorney. The Clerk was directed to close that motion and then close the case.

Disposition

The settlement was found fair and reasonable; the motion for Ramsha Ansari to withdraw as attorney was granted; and the case was ordered closed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.