Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 9, 2023

Barroso v. Table 87 Gowanus NYC LLC

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:23-cv-04864
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Barroso v. Table 87 Gowanus NYC LLC, Judge Failla granted the parties’ request to extend the deadline for filing FLSA settlement documents.

Who this affects

The parties in Barroso v. Table 87 Gowanus NYC LLC, including the plaintiff and defendants, received additional time to file their proposed Fair Labor Standards Act settlement documents.

What happened

In Barroso v. Table 87 Gowanus NYC LLC, the parties jointly asked for more time to submit a proposed settlement agreement and related documents for court review under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The documents were due November 10, 2023. The parties said they were finalizing the documents and requested permission to file them by November 24, 2023.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the request, set November 24 as the new filing deadline, and directed the clerk to terminate the pending motion at docket number 32.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Barroso v. Table 87 Gowanus NYC LLC · No. 1:23-cv-04864
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Nov. 9, 2023

Background

The parties jointly requested a two-week extension to file a proposed settlement agreement and related documents for court review under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The documents were due November 10, 2023, under the court’s October 19, 2023 order. The parties said they had exchanged drafts but did not expect to finalize the documents by the existing deadline because of scheduling conflicts in other pending matters.

Ruling

The court granted the application. It ordered the parties to file the proposed settlement agreement and related documents on or before November 24, 2023. Judge Katherine Polk Failla also directed the clerk to terminate the pending motion at docket number 32.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.