Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 27, 2023

Barroso v. Table 87 Gowanus NYC LLC

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:23-cv-04864
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureFlsa
In one sentence

In Barroso v. Table 87 Gowanus NYC LLC, Judge Failla granted the parties’ request to extend their FLSA settlement-filing deadline to December 15, 2023.

Who this affects

The parties in Barroso v. Table 87 Gowanus NYC LLC, including plaintiff, defendant Thomas Cucco, and the corporate defendants, received additional time to file settlement documents.

What happened

Barroso v. Table 87 Gowanus NYC LLC involved the parties’ joint request for more time to file a proposed settlement and related documents for court review under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The parties said they had exchanged drafts but could not meet the November 24 deadline. They explained that defendant Thomas Cucco, who was expected to sign for himself and the corporate defendants, was hospitalized after a medical procedure, and that the plaintiff had not yet signed the agreement.

The court granted the request and ordered the parties to file the settlement agreement and supporting documents by December 15, 2023. Judge Katherine Polk Failla also directed the clerk to terminate the pending motion at docket 34.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Barroso v. Table 87 Gowanus NYC LLC · No. 1:23-cv-04864
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Nov. 27, 2023

Background

The parties jointly requested a three-week extension of the deadline to file their proposed settlement agreement and supporting documents for court review under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The documents were then due November 24, 2023. The parties had already received one extension; the original deadline was November 10, 2023.

The parties reported that they had exchanged multiple drafts and were working to finalize the documents. They said defendant Thomas Cucco had recently undergone a medical procedure and remained hospitalized. Cucco was expected to sign the revised agreement for himself and as the authorized representative of the corporate defendants. The parties also stated that the plaintiff had not signed the agreement.

Ruling

The court granted the extension request. It ordered the parties to file their settlement agreement and supporting documents on or before December 15, 2023. The clerk was directed to terminate the pending motion at docket 34. The opinion does not approve or reject the settlement terms; it addresses the filing deadline.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.