DeLeon v. Dunaway
- Nelson Roman
- 7:22-cv-06039
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In DeLeon v. Dunaway, Judge Roman granted Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to substitute Douglas Dunaway, as estate administrator, for deceased Defendant Maria Louise Dunaway.
The plaintiffs, Douglas Dunaway as administrator of Maria Louise Dunaway’s estate, and the other named defendants.
What happened
The case, DeLeon v. Dunaway, involves the plaintiffs’ claims that the defendants engaged in harassment, racial taunts, and intimidation, including alleged violations of federal civil-rights law.
After Maria Louise Dunaway died, Douglas Dunaway notified the court and was appointed administrator of her estate. The plaintiffs moved to replace her with Douglas Dunaway in his administrator role.
Judge Nelson S. Roman granted the motion without opposition. The court ruled that the plaintiffs’ claims were remedial, meaning they could continue after Maria Louise Dunaway’s death, and ordered the substitution.
The detailed version
- DeLeon v. Dunaway · No. 7:22-cv-06039
- Nelson Roman
- Nov. 30, 2023
Background
The plaintiffs—Jason Deleon, Ana Carraca-Deleon, Ariela Rosa Mori-Gehring, and Walter Gehring—asserted claims against Douglas Dunaway, Maria Louise Dunaway, and Michael Dunaway. The complaint included claims alleging an ongoing campaign of harassment, racial taunts, and intimidation, including alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1982.
Maria Louise Dunaway died during the case. Douglas Dunaway filed a statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 and a death certificate. The court stayed the case while an administrator for Maria Louise Dunaway’s estate was appointed. Douglas Dunaway later informed the court that the Westchester County Surrogate’s Court had appointed him administrator of the estate.
Motion and governing rule
The plaintiffs moved under Rule 25(a)(1) to substitute Douglas Dunaway as administrator of Maria Louise Dunaway’s estate for Maria Louise Dunaway as a defendant. Rule 25 permits substitution when a party dies and the claim is not extinguished. The court explained that claims considered penal generally end at death, while remedial claims generally survive. The court also noted that Rule 25 ordinarily requires a substitution motion within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, with a possible extension when identifying the proper representative is significantly difficult.
Ruling
The court found that the claims in this action were remedial in nature and therefore survived Maria Louise Dunaway’s death. It granted the plaintiffs’ motion without opposition and ordered that Douglas Dunaway, as the administrator of Maria Louise Dunaway, be substituted for Maria Louise Dunaway. The court directed the plaintiffs to serve the Opinion and Order on the named defendants by regular mail within 21 days and file proof of service. The Clerk was directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 44.
Judge Nelson S. Roman’s order addressed the substitution issue only; it did not decide the merits of the plaintiffs’ underlying claims.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.