Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 8, 2023

Tianhai Lace USA, Inc. v. Zara USA, Inc.

Judge
Denise Cote
Docket
1:23-cv-06597
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
12
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Tianhai Lace v. Zara, Judge Cote entered a protective order governing confidential discovery information and its use in the lawsuit.

Who this affects

Tianhai Lace USA, Inc., Zara USA, Inc., their counsel, authorized employees, experts, consultants, witnesses, third parties who agree or are ordered to follow the order, and other people who receive protected information.

What happened

In Tianhai Lace USA, Inc. v. Zara USA, Inc., the parties agreed to rules protecting confidential and business-sensitive information exchanged during discovery. The order covers trade secrets, product designs, business plans, financial information, customer and vendor identities, research, and private personal information.

The information may be used only to prepare for and conduct this case, including appeals. It may be shared only with specified people, such as the parties’ lawyers, approved employees, experts, consultants, witnesses, and the court. More sensitive material may be labeled “Highly Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” and generally may be seen only by lawyers and other authorized persons. The order also establishes procedures for challenging confidentiality designations and requires most protected material to be returned or destroyed after the litigation ends.

Judge Denise Cote approved the stipulated protective order. The order does not decide the parties’ underlying claims; it governs confidentiality and discovery practices in the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tianhai Lace USA, Inc. v. Zara USA, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-06597
Judge
Denise Cote
Date
Dec. 8, 2023

Nature of the Order

This is a stipulated protective order concerning confidential or business-sensitive information. Counsel for all parties agreed to its terms. The order governs information produced, given, or filed during discovery and other proceedings in the case, including protected information produced before the order’s date.

Protected Information and Permitted Use

“Confidential Information” includes trade secrets; product designs; product and business plans; manufacturing processes; nonpublic business information; financial data; sales, costs, profits, and overhead information; vendor and customer identities; confidential research, development, and commercial information; testing and test results; and confidential, proprietary, or private personal information.

Protected information may be used only to prepare for and conduct this action, including appeals. It may not be used for business, competitive, governmental, research, development, or any other purpose. The order does not prevent a litigation attorney from giving litigation advice to a client based on the attorney’s review of designated information, but the attorney may not disclose protected contents or sources that the client is not otherwise authorized to receive.

Confidentiality Levels and Disclosure

A producing person may designate information as “Confidential” if it fits the order’s definition. Information considered especially sensitive may be designated “Highly Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” including personnel records and nonpublic business or financial information such as customer or supplier lists, prices, sales, profits, and sales projections.

Confidential information may be disclosed to outside counsel, assisting in-house counsel and legal staff, approved party officers, directors, or employees, the court and court personnel, approved witnesses, and qualifying outside investigators, experts, or consultants. Certain recipients must sign a written agreement to follow the order. Highly Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only information may generally be disclosed only to lawyers, the court and court personnel, approved witnesses, and qualifying outside investigators, experts, or consultants—not to the parties’ officers, directors, or employees under the ordinary disclosure provision.

The order includes limited exceptions for people who previously had access to the information, document authors and addressees, certain discussions with potential witnesses, and information that is public, lawfully obtained from a nonconfidential third party, already lawfully possessed, or independently developed.

Court Filings and Sealing

If protected information is used in a court proceeding, the parties must take steps to preserve its confidentiality unless the court orders otherwise. Materials subject to a confidentiality designation that are filed with the court must follow the Southern District of New York’s electronic-filing requirements for sealed materials. The parties acknowledge that sealing or redacting court filings must be narrowly tailored and consistent with the presumption of public access to judicial documents. A confidentiality agreement alone does not automatically justify sealing.

Challenges to Designations

A party objecting to a confidentiality designation must identify the challenged material and first try to resolve the dispute informally and in good faith. If the dispute is not resolved within ten business days, or if the producing party does not respond within that period, the objecting party may seek relief from the court. Until the court changes the designation, the material must continue to receive the ordered protection. The party asserting confidentiality bears the burden of establishing it.

End of Litigation and Continuing Obligations

Within 60 days after the litigation concludes, protected documents and transcripts, as well as summaries or other materials containing protected information, must generally be returned or destroyed. A party may retain a complete set of pleadings, deposition transcripts and exhibits, and trial transcripts and exhibits. The order continues to bind the parties after the case ends, and the court retains limited jurisdiction to enforce its obligations.

Expert Materials

Draft reports, notes, outlines, and other writings leading to a testifying expert’s final report are exempt from discovery. Communications and materials generated by the expert are also exempt unless they contain information the expert relied on, or relevant information the expert considered but did not rely on, in forming an opinion. Final reports and materials containing nonexempt information must be produced, with redactions allowed when materials contain both exempt and nonexempt information.

The authoritative version

Read the full 12-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.