In Re: Celsius Network LLC
- Gregory Woods
- 1:23-cv-10036
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In re Celsius Network, Judge Woods granted appellants’ motion to keep specified commercially sensitive records under seal.
Equities First Holdings, LLC, Alexander Christy, Celsius Network Limited, and members of the public seeking access to the specified court records.
What happened
In In re Celsius Network, Equities First Holdings, LLC, and Alexander Christy asked the court to keep specified documents sealed in their appeal involving Celsius Network Limited. The motion was filed on December 11, 2023.
The court said the documents were court records, but the public’s interest in access was modest because the records contained commercially sensitive business and financial information that was unlikely to matter to the appeal. The court also considered the possible commercial impact on the appellants.
Judge Woods granted the motion to seal for the specified redactions highlighted in yellow and green. The ruling applied only to the information at issue at this stage and on the existing record, and the clerk was directed to close the pending motion.
The detailed version
- In Re: Celsius Network LLC · No. 1:23-cv-10036
- Gregory Woods
- Dec. 13, 2023
Background
Equities First Holdings, LLC, and Alexander Christy, the appellants, filed a motion on December 11, 2023, asking the court to keep certain documents under seal. The appeal concerns a decision from the Bankruptcy Court involving Celsius Network Limited. The motion was docketed at Dkt. No. 40.
Legal standard
The court applied the Second Circuit’s three-step test for sealing court records. First, it determines whether the materials are “judicial documents”—documents submitted to the court that are relevant and useful to the judicial process. Second, it determines how much weight the presumption of public access deserves based on the materials’ role in the court’s work. Third, it identifies legitimate reasons against disclosure and balances those reasons against the public’s interest in access.
Ruling
The court found that the documents were judicial documents, but that the presumption of public access was modest. The information consisted of commercially sensitive business and financial information that was unlikely to have significance for the court’s consideration of the bankruptcy appeal. The court explained that the public-access interest concerned the court’s evaluation of the Bankruptcy Court’s decision, not the merits of the underlying litigation. The potential commercial impact on the appellants outweighed the public interest in disclosure at this time.
The motion to seal was granted for the specified redactions highlighted in yellow and green. The court stated that the decision applied only to the information at issue at this stage of the case and on the existing record. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the motion at Dkt. No. 40.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.