Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 17, 2024

In Re: Celsius Network LLC

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:23-cv-10036
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureBankruptcy
In one sentence

Equities First v. Celsius: Judge Woods granted Celsius’s motion to file a redacted opposition, sealing commercially sensitive business and financial information.

Who this affects

The order affects Celsius Network Limited’s opposition filing, the appellants Equities First Holdings, LLC, and Alexander Christy, and the public’s access to the specified commercially sensitive business and financial information.

What happened

In Equities First Holdings, LLC, and Alexander Christy v. Celsius Network Limited, Celsius asked to file its opposition brief with redactions allowed by an earlier order. The redactions concerned sensitive business and financial information.

Judge Woods explained that court filings may be sealed only after considering whether they are judicial documents, the strength of the public’s access interest, and reasons supporting confidentiality. The court found that the public-access interest was modest because the information was unlikely to matter to the appeal from the Bankruptcy Court.

Judge Woods granted the motion to seal for the specified information highlighted in yellow. The court said the potential commercial impact on the appellants outweighed the public’s interest in disclosure at this stage and on the record before it. The Clerk was directed to terminate the pending motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In Re: Celsius Network LLC · No. 1:23-cv-10036
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Jan. 17, 2024

Background

Celsius Network Limited, the appellee, filed a motion asking for permission to file its opposition to the opening brief of appellants Equities First Holdings, LLC, and Alexander Christy with redactions. The request relied on the court’s December 13, 2023 order, which allowed certain sensitive material to be filed under seal.

Legal standard

The court applied the three-step test described by the Second Circuit for sealing court records. First, the court determines whether the material is a judicial document—that is, material submitted to the court that is relevant to its judicial work and useful in the judicial process. Second, the court determines how much weight to give the public’s presumed right to access that document. Third, the court identifies legitimate reasons for limiting disclosure and balances those reasons against the public-access interest.

Court’s analysis

The court found that the documents at issue were judicial documents. It also found that the presumption of public access was modest because the information consisted of commercially sensitive business and financial information that was unlikely to have significance to the court’s consideration of the appeal from the Bankruptcy Court. The court noted that the public-access interest concerned the court’s evaluation of the Bankruptcy Court’s decision, not the merits of the underlying litigation.

The court determined that the potential commercial impact on the appellants outweighed the public’s interest in disclosure of the sealed records at this stage. The court limited its determination to the information at issue, the specified redactions highlighted in yellow, and the record before it.

Disposition

The court granted the motion to seal and granted the application to file Celsius’s opposition with the specified redactions. It directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 51.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.