Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 14, 2023

Cox v. Procida Construction Corp.

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:22-cv-10549
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Cox v. Procida Construction Corp., Judge Netburn ordered the parties to file their proposed FLSA settlement for fairness review.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs, including Kyle Cox, and the defendants, including Procida Construction Corp., are affected because they must file the proposed settlement agreement and a joint explanatory letter by January 12, 2024.

What happened

Kyle Cox and the other plaintiffs sued Procida Construction Corp. and the other defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties told the court they had reached a settlement in principle.

Because the case involved Fair Labor Standards Act claims, the court said it must review the settlement to determine whether it is fair. The court ordered the parties to file the settlement agreement and a joint explanation by January 12, 2024.

Judge Sarah Netburn also postponed all future dates and deadlines indefinitely. The order did not approve the settlement or decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cox v. Procida Construction Corp. · No. 1:22-cv-10549
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
Dec. 14, 2023

Background

The plaintiffs brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing wage and hour matters. The parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.

Court’s Action

The court explained that a settlement of Fair Labor Standards Act claims must be reviewed for fairness. It cited decisions identifying factors relevant to evaluating whether a proposed settlement and any attorney-fee award are fair and reasonable.

The court ordered the parties to file their settlement agreement by January 12, 2024. On the same date, they must file a joint letter explaining the basis for the proposed settlement and why it is fair and reasonable. The court adjourned all future dates and deadlines indefinitely.

Disposition

This order required further filings for settlement review. It did not approve the settlement or resolve the underlying claims.

Judge

United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn entered the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.