Taylor v. America The County America
- Laura Swain
- 1:23-cv-09083
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
Christopher Taylor v. America The County America: Judge Swain revoked fee-free status and dismissed the case without prejudice under the prisoner filing bar.
Christopher Taylor’s ability to proceed in this action without prepaying filing fees was affected. The case was dismissed without prejudice, Taylor was not charged the filing fee, and no funds were to be taken from his prison trust account for this lawsuit.
What happened
In Christopher Taylor v. America The County America, Christopher Taylor, who was incarcerated and representing himself, sued America The County America and President Joe Biden. The court had previously allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees upfront.
The court later found that Taylor had at least three prior qualifying dismissals under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. It also decided that his allegations did not show he faced an immediate danger of serious physical injury when he filed this case.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain revoked Taylor’s fee-free status and dismissed the case without prejudice under the prisoner filing bar. The court directed that Taylor not be charged the filing fee or have funds taken from his prison account, and denied fee-free status for any appeal.
The detailed version
- Taylor v. America The County America · No. 1:23-cv-09083
- Laura Swain
- Jan. 3, 2024
Background
Christopher Taylor, who was incarcerated at the time and represented himself, brought this federal civil action against America The County America and President Joe Biden. The court had previously granted Taylor permission to proceed without paying filing fees upfront.
Three-strikes finding
The Prison Litigation Reform Act bars a prisoner from proceeding without prepaying filing fees if the prisoner has, on three or more prior occasions while incarcerated or detained, brought an action or appeal that was dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failing to state a claim. An exception applies when the prisoner is in immediate danger of serious physical injury.
The court revisited its earlier assessment of Taylor’s prior cases. It explained that an earlier related proceeding had relied on a Colorado court’s finding that Taylor had three strikes. After later appellate guidance requiring an independent review, this court determined that those three dismissals did not count as strikes because they were based on a statutory ground that does not qualify under the filing-bar provision. The court nevertheless found that Taylor had accumulated at least three qualifying strikes through other prior proceedings, including dismissals for frivolousness and failure to state a claim.
Imminent-danger analysis
Taylor’s complaint alleged that federal, state, and local officials were involved in bribery, murder, drug investigations, communications between jurisdictions, and a planned prison term. The court quoted the allegations as written and concluded that they did not show that Taylor faced immediate danger of serious physical injury when he filed the complaint.
Ruling and effect
The court revoked Taylor’s permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees and dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The order states that Taylor is barred from filing a new federal civil action without prepaying fees while he remains a prisoner unless he alleges immediate danger of serious physical injury. The court directed the Clerk not to charge Taylor the $350 filing fee for this action and directed that no funds be deducted or encumbered from his prison trust account for this lawsuit.
The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also directed the Clerk to enter judgment.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.