Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 11, 2024

Ortega v. Hodge

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-00204
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Ortega v. Hodge, Chief Judge Swain ordered payment or an application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days.

Who this affects

Christopher Ortega must either pay the required fees or submit the IFP application and prisoner authorization within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Ortega v. Hodge, Christopher Ortega filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepaying them. The order identifies Ortega as incarcerated at the Westchester County Jail and proceeding without a lawyer.

The court gave Ortega 30 days to either pay $405 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. The authorization would allow installment payments of the $350 filing fee from his prison account. No answer was required at that time.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that the case would proceed through the Clerk’s Office if Ortega complied and would be dismissed if he did not. The court also denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for any appeal from this order, finding that such an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ortega v. Hodge · No. 1:24-cv-00204
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 11, 2024

Background

Christopher Ortega filed this civil action without a lawyer. The opinion states that he was incarcerated at the Westchester County Jail. He submitted his complaint without paying the filing fees and without completing an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), meaning without prepaying the fees, or a required prisoner authorization.

Required filing or payment

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $405—the $350 filing fee and $55 administrative fee—or request IFP status by submitting the required application and prisoner authorization. If IFP status is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires collection of the $350 filing fee in installments from the prisoner’s account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to provide certified account statements for the preceding six months and deduct the required payments.

Ruling and consequences

The court ordered Ortega, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $405 in fees or submit the attached IFP application and prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 24-CV-0204 (LTS). No answer was required at that time. If Ortega complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office’s procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order also cautioned that certain dismissals of a prisoner’s federal civil action or appeal may count as “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.