Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 19, 2024

Gorneff v. Ilishayev

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-10520
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Gorneff v. Ilishayev, Judge Swain dismissed the duplicate complaint without prejudice and denied appeal fee-waiver status.

Who this affects

The dismissal affects Serge L. Gorneff’s duplicate lawsuit against Mr. Ruslan Ilishayev, Metropolitan Commercial Bank, and the other named defendants; his separate pending case under docket number 1:23-CV-9141 was not dismissed by this order.

What happened

Serge L. Gorneff, representing himself, sued Mr. Ruslan Ilishayev, Metropolitan Commercial Bank, and other defendants, alleging that they violated his rights. The opinion does not describe the underlying alleged violations.

The court said Gorneff had already filed a substantially similar case against the defendants, asserting the same claims, and that case was still pending under docket number 1:23-CV-9141. The court found that litigating the duplicate case would serve no useful purpose.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed this complaint without prejudice to Gorneff’s pending case and directed the Clerk to enter judgment. She also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal after certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gorneff v. Ilishayev · No. 1:23-cv-10520
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 19, 2024

Background

Serge L. Gorneff, who was representing himself, brought a complaint against Mr. Ruslan Ilishayev, Metropolitan Commercial Bank, and other defendants. He alleged that the defendants violated his rights, but the court did not describe those alleged violations in this order.

Reason for dismissal

The court stated that Gorneff had previously submitted a substantially similar complaint against the defendants asserting the same claims. That earlier case was still pending before the same court under docket number 1:23-CV-9141. Because the current complaint raised the same claims, the court concluded that litigating this duplicate lawsuit would serve no useful purpose.

The order also noted that, in the earlier round of this case, the court had dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim but had allowed Gorneff 30 days to replead his state-law claims by alleging facts showing diversity-of-citizenship jurisdiction. That earlier ruling was background to the present dismissal; this order dismissed the current complaint as duplicative.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed Gorneff’s complaint as duplicative of docket number 1:23-CV-9141, without prejudice to the pending case. The court directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Gorneff permission to appeal without paying the required fees. The opinion does not state whether Gorneff filed an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.