Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 26, 2024

Ortega Juarez v. Mi Mexico Mini Market & Grocery Inc.

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:23-cv-06978
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
EmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ortega Juarez v. Mi Mexico Mini Market & Grocery Inc., Judge Aaron entered default judgment for $217,249.50 plus fees, interest, and possible increases.

Who this affects

Ruben Ortega Juarez received a default judgment against Mi Mexico Mini Market & Grocery Inc. and the other defendants, who were ordered to pay the stated damages, fees, costs, interest, and any applicable 15% increase.

What happened

In Ortega Juarez v. Mi Mexico Mini Market & Grocery Inc., the court entered a default judgment for Ruben Ortega Juarez against the defendants after adopting a prior report in its entirety. The order states that the report was factually and legally sound and not clearly erroneous, and that no timely objections were filed.

The judgment awarded $217,249.50, consisting of $108,624.75 in minimum and overtime wages and the same amount in liquidated damages. It also awarded $2,543.00 in attorney’s fees and costs, plus $34,739.089 in prejudgment interest calculated at 9% per year on $108,624.75 from July 8, 2020, through the judgment date.

Judge Stewart Aaron entered the judgment on January 26, 2024. The order also provided for an automatic 15% increase in the total judgment if specified amounts remained unpaid after the applicable 90-day period, stated that the lack of timely objections precluded appellate review, and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ortega Juarez v. Mi Mexico Mini Market & Grocery Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-06978
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
Jan. 26, 2024

Background

Ruben Ortega Juarez sued Mi Mexico Mini Market & Grocery Inc. and other defendants individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. The opinion excerpt does not describe the underlying allegations in detail. It refers to a prior report and to the court’s January 26, 2024 Memorandum Opinion and Order, but those documents are not included in the excerpt.

Court’s Analysis

The court stated that the report’s reasoning was sound, grounded in fact and law, and not clearly erroneous. The court adopted the report in its entirety. The order also stated that the report provided clear notice and that no timely objections had been filed; as a result, the lack of objections precluded appellate review of the decision.

Disposition

The court entered default judgment in favor of Ruben Ortega Juarez and against the defendants. A default judgment is a judgment entered when a defendant has not defended the case; this excerpt does not explain the defendants’ nonappearance or otherwise describe the underlying litigation.

The judgment totaled $217,249.50, made up of:

- $108,624.75 in minimum and overtime wages; - $108,624.75 in liquidated damages; - $2,543.00 in attorney’s fees and costs; and - $34,739.089 in prejudgment interest, calculated at New York’s statutory rate of 9% per year on $108,624.75 from July 8, 2020, through the date judgment was entered.

The order further provided that, if any amounts remained unpaid after 90 days following issuance of the judgment, or 90 days after the time to appeal expired while no appeal was pending, whichever was later, the total judgment would automatically increase by 15% under Section 198(4) of the New York Labor Law. The case was closed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.