Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 31, 2024

MYPARKINGTICKETS.COM LLC v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-00397
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Myparkingtickets.com LLC v. The City of New York, Judge Swain ordered Toussaint to provide a valid address or face dismissal without prejudice.

Who this affects

Fritz Gerald Toussaint, whom the court found to be the actual filer, must provide a valid address within 30 days to avoid the warned-of dismissal. The order also affects the continued status of the action against The City of New York and potentially Toussaint's ability to file future actions without paying court fees.

What happened

Myparkingtickets.com LLC v. The City of New York was transferred to the Southern District of New York, where the court found that Fritz Gerald Toussaint—not the company named in the caption—filed the complaint.

The court found that the San Diego address Toussaint provided was not current, based on his history in other cases. It ordered him to provide a valid current address within 30 days and warned that the case would otherwise be dismissed without prejudice for failing to pursue it.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also warned that future filings without a valid address could lead to restrictions on filing without paying court fees. The court denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
MYPARKINGTICKETS.COM LLC v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK · No. 1:24-cv-00397
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 31, 2024

Background

The complaint was initially filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and then transferred to the Southern District of New York. Although the caption identified Myparkingtickets.com LLC as the plaintiff, the court found that Fritz Gerald Toussaint, an individual, actually filed the complaint. The court relied on the Eastern District docket, the handwriting on the complaint, and the address listed in the filing, which matched an address Toussaint had frequently used.

Toussaint listed 6522 El Cajon Blvd., St. 124, PMB 137, San Diego, California 92115 as his address. The court concluded from his litigation history that this was not a valid current address. The court noted that mail sent to that address had previously been returned in other cases and that courts had previously required him to provide updated addresses.

Order

The court directed Toussaint to provide a valid current address in writing within 30 days of the order. It warned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. A dismissal without prejudice generally does not bar a later filing, although this order itself did not dismiss the action.

The court also warned that continuing to file cases without providing a valid address could lead to an order requiring Toussaint to explain why he should not be barred from filing new actions without paying court fees unless he first received permission. The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order did not decide the underlying claims against the City of New York.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.