Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 1, 2024

Palushaj v. Atalian Global Services, Inc.

Judge
Ho
Docket
1:23-cv-04206
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
EmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Palushaj v. Atalian Global Services, Judge Ho granted a stay while the parties pursued settlement approval and adjourned deadlines pending further order.

Who this affects

Gjeto Palushaj, Atalian Global Services, Inc., and Atalian US Northeast, LLC; all proceedings and deadlines in their case were paused.

What happened

Palushaj v. Atalian Global Services, Inc. is an employment case brought by Gjeto Palushaj against Atalian Global Services, Inc. and Atalian US Northeast, LLC. The parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.

The parties asked for a 30-day pause while they prepared a motion seeking approval of the settlement. The opinion does not state the claims or the settlement’s terms.

Judge Dale E. Ho granted the application, stayed all proceedings, and adjourned all deadlines pending further order. The parties were directed to file their settlement-approval motion by March 1, 2024.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Palushaj v. Atalian Global Services, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-04206
Judge
Ho
Date
Feb. 1, 2024

Background

Gjeto Palushaj sued Atalian Global Services, Inc. and Atalian US Northeast, LLC in an employment matter. Counsel for Palushaj stated that all parties had reached a settlement in principle and asked the court to pause the case for 30 days while they prepared a motion for settlement approval. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or provide the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

The court granted the application. It stayed all proceedings and adjourned all deadlines, with no new date set, pending further order of the court. The parties were ordered to file their motion for approval of the settlement by March 1, 2024. The order did not itself approve the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.