Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 31, 2024

David v. Immigration Department & Immigration Custon Emforcement

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-09503
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In David v. Immigration Department, Judge Swain ordered David to update his address within 30 days or face dismissal without prejudice.

Who this affects

Martin James David must provide the court with a new address within 30 days. If he does not, the action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The order also denies fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

What happened

In Martin James David v. Immigration Department; Immigration Custon Emforcement - ICE, the court said mail sent to David’s recorded address had been returned as undeliverable. The court had previously allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees and had directed him to file an amended complaint.

The court ordered David to provide his new address in writing within 30 days. If he does not, the court will dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute, meaning he may refile it. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order on January 31, 2024. She certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
David v. Immigration Department & Immigration Custon Emforcement · No. 1:23-cv-09503
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 31, 2024

Background

The court stated that it had granted Martin James David permission to proceed without paying filing fees on November 28, 2023. On January 2, 2024, the court directed him to file an amended complaint. Both orders were mailed to the address listed in the case record. On January 23, 2024, the order granting permission to proceed without paying filing fees was returned as undeliverable.

Address-update order

The court ordered David to provide his updated address in writing within 30 days of the order. The court explained that under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it may dismiss an action for failure to prosecute when a plaintiff does not provide a new address and the court cannot contact him, after giving notice of that possibility.

The court did not dismiss the action in this order. Instead, it warned that failure to provide the updated address within the 30-day period would result in dismissal of the action without prejudice under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. “Without prejudice” means the dismissal would not bar David from refiling the action.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying filing fees for purposes of an appeal.

Disposition

The court ordered David to update his address within 30 days and warned that noncompliance would result in dismissal without prejudice. It also denied fee-free status for an appeal from the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.