Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Feb. 2, 2024

Donna M.L. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Docket
1:23-cv-05143
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Donna M.L. v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court entered judgment for Donna M.L. after adopting its Report.

Who this affects

Donna M.L. received judgment in her favor. The Commissioner of Social Security was the defendant. The excerpt does not explain the practical effect of the judgment beyond that disposition.

What happened

Donna M.L. v. Commissioner of Social Security involved Donna M.L.’s case against the Commissioner of Social Security. The judgment says the court had issued a memorandum opinion and order on February 2, 2024, but this text does not describe the underlying dispute or arguments.

The court adopted the Report in its entirety and entered judgment in favor of Donna M.L. The judgment also states that the lack of timely objections, despite clear notice in the Report, precludes appellate review of the decision.

The court entered the judgment on February 2, 2024. The opinion text identifies the clerk, Ruby J. Krajick, but does not name the judge; the court therefore cannot be identified more specifically here.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Donna M.L. v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:23-cv-05143
Date
Feb. 2, 2024

What the court decided

The court adopted the Report in its entirety and entered judgment in favor of Donna M.L. The opinion excerpt does not state whether the underlying Social Security decision was reversed, remanded, or otherwise altered, and it does not provide the legal reasoning from the referenced Report or memorandum opinion and order.

Appellate review

The judgment states that the Report provided clear notice and that no timely objections were filed. It therefore says that appellate review of the decision is precluded. The judgment cites Frank, 968 F.2d at 300.

Disposition

Judgment was entered in favor of Donna M.L. on February 2, 2024. The excerpt identifies Ruby J. Krajick as the Clerk of Court and does not identify the presiding judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.