Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 9, 2024

Joe v. FDNY

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-00948
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Joe v. FDNY, Judge Swain transferred the pro se injury case to the Eastern District of New York because Brooklyn was the relevant location.

Who this affects

Willie L. Joe's case will proceed, if otherwise permitted, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York rather than the Southern District of New York. The order also affects his ability to appeal without paying filing fees.

What happened

In Willie L. Joe v. FDNY/City of N.Y., Willie L. Joe alleged that an ambulance struck him while he was crossing a Brooklyn street on November 1, 2013, causing serious injuries. He sued the New York City Fire Department and City of New York, Kevin Simpkin, and Jane Doe, and invoked diversity jurisdiction.

The Southern District of New York transferred the case to the Eastern District of New York. The court said the events occurred in Brooklyn, which is in the Eastern District, and that important witnesses and documents would likely be there. The court also noted that Joe does not live in the Southern District and that the complaint did not establish that venue was proper there.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the transfer under the federal convenience-and-justice statute, closed the Southern District case, and directed that no summons issue there. The court also denied Joe permission to appeal without paying filing fees, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Joe v. FDNY · No. 1:24-cv-00948
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 9, 2024

Background

Willie L. Joe, representing himself, brought the action under the court’s diversity-of-citizenship jurisdiction. He alleged that on November 1, 2013, an ambulance struck him while he was crossing a street in Brooklyn, New York, causing serious injuries. He named the New York City Fire Department and the City of New York, Kevin Simpkin, the ambulance driver, and Jane Doe, the driver of the vehicle that struck the ambulance. Joe currently resides in North Carolina.

The complaint also referred to an earlier lawyer, a doctor who allegedly would not testify, and a judge whom Joe described as biased. The opinion states that publicly available records did not show whether Joe had filed the earlier lawsuit in the Southern or Eastern Districts of New York; for purposes of this transfer order, the court assumed it had been filed in state court.

Venue and transfer

Federal venue law allows a civil action to be filed in certain districts, including where a substantial part of the events occurred. The court concluded that the allegations did not establish that the Southern District was a proper venue under that rule. Venue might have been proper there based on the City of New York’s location, but only if the two individual defendants also resided in New York State; the complaint did not provide enough information to establish that point.

The court then applied 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which permits transfer to another federal district where the case could have been brought when transfer would be more convenient for the parties and witnesses and would serve the interests of justice. The court determined that transfer was appropriate because the underlying events occurred in Brooklyn, and it was reasonable to expect that relevant documents and witnesses would be in the Eastern District. Joe’s choice of the Southern District received less weight because he does not reside there and the events did not occur there.

Disposition

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The Clerk was directed to transfer the action, no summons was to issue from the Southern District, and the order closed the Southern District case. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The transfer order did not decide whether Joe’s underlying injury claims were legally valid.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.