Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 13, 2024

TOUSSAINT v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICE

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-00087
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Toussaint v. Cavalry Portfolio Service, Judge Swain ordered an updated address within 30 days or dismissal without prejudice.

Who this affects

Fritz Gerald Toussaint must provide the court with a valid address in writing within 30 days or the court will dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The order also affects any attempted appeal by denying payment-free status for that appeal.

What happened

In Fritz Gerald Toussaint v. Cavalry Portfolio Service, Fritz Gerald Toussaint filed the case without a lawyer and did not provide the filing fee or a completed request to proceed without prepaying fees. The court could not mail him an earlier transfer order because his address was not deliverable.

The court noted that Toussaint had not provided a new mailing address, agreed to receive documents electronically, or made any further written filing. It gave him 30 days from the order’s date to provide a valid address in writing.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Toussaint to update his address within 30 days. The court said it will dismiss the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute if he does not comply, and it denied payment-free status for an appeal after certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
TOUSSAINT v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICE · No. 1:24-cv-00087
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 13, 2024

Background

Fritz Gerald Toussaint, who was proceeding without a lawyer, originally filed this action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The case was transferred to the Southern District of New York. The complaint did not include the $405 filing fee or a completed and signed request to proceed without prepaying court fees.

The Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s transfer order was mailed to Toussaint but returned as undeliverable. Toussaint had not notified the Southern District of New York of a new address, had not agreed to receive court documents electronically, and had not made any further written submissions. The opinion also noted that, in an earlier related proceeding, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania had required Toussaint to provide a valid mailing address or email address before filing additional pleadings or civil actions there.

Court’s Order

The court directed Toussaint to provide his new address in writing within 30 days of the order. It warned that, if he failed to comply, the court would dismiss this action without prejudice under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. A dismissal without prejudice would leave open the possibility of refiling under the conditions stated by the court.

The court did not dismiss the action in this order. It also provided a consent form that Toussaint could use to receive notices and documents electronically. The clerk was directed to docket the order and provide a copy if Toussaint appeared at the court’s pro se intake unit, but not to mail the order because he had not supplied a valid mailing address.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied payment-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.