Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 14, 2024

Shabazz v. The United States of America

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-10546
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Shabazz v. United States, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Shabazz neither paid filing fees nor submitted an IFP application.

Who this affects

Danny Amen Anderson Valentine Shabazz’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice, while the United States of America and Barack Obama were defendants in the dismissed action. Permission to appeal without paying fees was also denied.

What happened

In Shabazz v. United States, the court ordered the plaintiff to submit an application to proceed without paying filing fees or pay the $405 filing fee. The plaintiff did neither.

The court also noted that it could not mail its earlier order because the complaint did not include the plaintiff’s address, and the plaintiff had not provided one or contacted the court again.

Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment. She also denied the plaintiff permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shabazz v. The United States of America · No. 1:23-cv-10546
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 14, 2024

Background

Danny Amen Anderson Valentine Shabazz filed a complaint against the United States of America and Barack Obama. The court had previously ordered Shabazz, within thirty days, either to submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee or to pay the $405 required to file a civil action. The order warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal.

The opinion states that Shabazz did not submit the application or pay the fee. It also states that the court could not mail the earlier order because the complaint did not include Shabazz’s address. Shabazz did not provide an address or have further contact with the court about the matter.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment. It also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the appellate filing fees. The opinion does not address the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.