Davis v. T&T Express Shipping, LLC
- Stewart Aaron
- 1:22-cv-01936
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Davis v. T&T Express Shipping, Judge Aaron dismissed the settled action with prejudice while retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement.
The plaintiffs and defendants in the action are affected because the case was dismissed with prejudice. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce their settlement agreement.
What happened
In Dawain Davis v. T&T Express Shipping, LLC, the parties submitted a fully signed settlement agreement after the court preliminarily approved the settlement.
The court dismissed the action with prejudice, meaning the case was closed and could not be brought again, except that the court would retain authority to enforce the settlement agreement. The dismissal was without costs except as provided in that agreement.
Judge Stewart D. Aaron ordered the clerk to close the case.
The detailed version
- Davis v. T&T Express Shipping, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-01936
- Stewart Aaron
- Feb. 15, 2024
Background
On February 14, 2024, the court preliminarily approved the parties’ settlement, pending submission of a fully executed settlement agreement. On February 15, 2024, the parties filed that fully executed agreement.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be dismissed with prejudice and without costs, except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction, meaning continuing authority, to enforce the settlement agreement. The clerk was requested to close the case.
Disposition
Judge Stewart D. Aaron dismissed the action with prejudice and retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.