Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.OtherFiled Feb. 23, 2024

Jimenez v. S&MA Contracting Inc.

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:24-cv-00065
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureEmployment
In one sentence

In Jimenez v. S&MA Contracting Inc., Judge Carter received counsel’s request for more time to serve defendants, but the excerpt shows no ruling.

Who this affects

The filing concerns Jose Jimenez, S&MA Contracting Inc., Waris Ali, and Asaad Ali, also identified as Nassir Ali, in connection with service of a court order and the deadline for filing an affidavit of service.

What happened

In Jimenez v. S&MA Contracting Inc., the plaintiff’s lawyers asked the court for a short extension of a deadline to serve the defendants with a February 21, 2024 court order.

The lawyers said a process server could serve S&MA Contracting Inc. on February 22 but needed more time to serve Waris Ali and Asaad Ali, also known as Nassir Ali. They asked to extend the deadline for serving the order and filing proof of service.

The excerpt does not state whether the request was granted or denied. The document is addressed to and bears the signature of Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jimenez v. S&MA Contracting Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-00065
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Feb. 23, 2024

What the filing concerns

The plaintiff’s counsel, Bell Law Group, PLLC, wrote to the court about an earlier order dated February 21, 2024. That order directed counsel to serve the order on the defendants and file an affidavit of service by February 22, 2024.

Request for an extension

Counsel requested a short extension. The letter states that a process server could serve the corporate defendant, S&MA Contracting Inc., on February 22, but needed additional time to serve the individual defendants, Waris Ali and Asaad Ali, also identified as Nassir Ali.

Disposition shown in the excerpt

The provided text does not contain an express ruling granting or denying the extension request. It includes the letter and a dated signature block for Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr., but it does not state the court’s disposition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.