Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 21, 2024

Pagan v. Midhudson Forensic Psychiatric Hospital

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-10050
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Pagan v. Midhudson Forensic Psychiatric Hospital, Judge Swain granted Pagan more time to file an amended complaint and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Jerry Pagan, whose deadline to file an amended complaint was extended, and the defendants because the case remained pending subject to that deadline.

What happened

In Pagan v. Midhudson Forensic Psychiatric Hospital, the court had previously dismissed Jerry Pagan’s complaint but allowed him 30 days to file an amended complaint. Pagan then asked for more time.

The court granted Pagan’s request and set Friday, March 22, 2024, as the new deadline for filing an amended complaint. The court said that if Pagan missed the deadline, the Clerk of Court would be directed to enter judgment in the case.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied Pagan permission to appeal without paying the filing fees. This order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pagan v. Midhudson Forensic Psychiatric Hospital · No. 1:23-cv-10050
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 21, 2024

Background

On January 16, 2024, the court dismissed Jerry Pagan’s complaint and gave him 30 days to file an amended complaint. The court received Pagan’s February 6, 2024, letter asking for additional time.

Ruling

The court granted Pagan’s request for additional time. It ordered that the amended complaint be filed by Friday, March 22, 2024. The court stated that if Pagan did not file an amended complaint by that deadline, it would direct the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in the action.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees. The order addressed filing time and appeal-fee status; it did not decide the merits of Pagan’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.