Grant v. Commissioner of Social Security
- 1:23-cv-08201
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Grant v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court dismissed the untimely action and closed the case; the opinion identifies no judge.
The dismissal ended the plaintiff's action against the Commissioner of Social Security because the court found it untimely.
What happened
In Grant v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court stated that the action was untimely and therefore had to be dismissed.
The court adopted the report and recommendation in full. The judgment does not explain the underlying timing issue or address the merits of the Social Security dispute.
The court dismissed the action and closed the case on February 27, 2024. The opinion identifies the clerk, Ruby J. Krajick, but does not identify the judge.
The detailed version
- Grant v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:23-cv-08201
- Feb. 27, 2024
Background
The plaintiff, Michaellavargrant as displayed in the caption, sued the Commissioner of Social Security. The judgment refers to reasons stated in a court order dated February 27, 2024, but that order is not included in the provided text.
Ruling
The court stated that the action was untimely and must be dismissed. It adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety and ordered that the case be closed. The provided judgment does not describe the underlying Social Security claims or decide their merits.
Disposition
The action was dismissed, and the case was closed. The opinion identifies Ruby J. Krajick as the clerk of court but does not identify the judge.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.