Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 28, 2024

Irving v. US Border Agency

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-01488
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Irving v. U.S. Border Agency: Judge Swain transferred the action to the Eastern District of New York because the events occurred at JFK.

Who this affects

Kenarice Irving's action against U.S. Border Agency was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The transferee court was left to decide whether Irving could proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

In Irving v. U.S. Border Agency, Kenarice Irving, representing himself, claimed that an unidentified badge-wearing person briefly detained and questioned him at JFK Airport after his return from Jamaica. Irving alleged that the person selectively enforced the law based on race.

The court transferred the action from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. It said the claims arose at JFK in Queens County, which is in the Eastern District, and that the Eastern District appeared more convenient because relevant witnesses and documents were likely to be there. The court did not decide whether Irving’s claims were valid.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the transfer, closed the case in the Southern District, and left any decision about allowing Irving to proceed without prepaying fees to the Eastern District. The court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees and directed that no summons issue from the Southern District.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Irving v. US Border Agency · No. 1:24-cv-01488
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 28, 2024

Background

Kenarice Irving brought the action without a lawyer. He alleged that his claims arose at John F. Kennedy Airport in Queens County, New York. According to the opinion, after Irving returned from Jamaica on September 5, 2023, an “aggressive arrogant man wearing a badge” briefly detained him, did not identify himself or his agency, and conducted a “hostile” interrogation. Irving alleged that the individual engaged in selective enforcement based on race.

Venue and Transfer

The court explained that federal venue generally is proper where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in some circumstances, where a defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction. The court concluded that venue was not proper in the Southern District under the provision covering where the events occurred because JFK Airport is in Queens County, within the Eastern District of New York. The complaint also did not show that the defendant resided in the Southern District, so it was unclear whether venue was proper there on that basis.

The court determined that transfer was appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which allows a court to move a case for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The underlying events occurred in Queens County, and the court considered it reasonable to expect that relevant documents and witnesses would also be located there. It therefore transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Disposition

The clerk was directed to transfer the action, and the Southern District case was closed. The opinion states that the transferee court would decide whether Irving could proceed without prepaying fees. The Southern District directed that no summons issue from that court. It also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court did not rule on the merits of Irving’s allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.