Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 28, 2024

Kenton v. The City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-01239
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Kenton v. City of New York: Judge Swain transferred this action to the Eastern District of New York because the alleged events occurred there.

Who this affects

Alisha Kenton’s case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The City of New York remains the sole defendant, and the Eastern District will decide whether Kenton may proceed without prepaying filing fees.

What happened

In Kenton v. The City of New York, Alisha Kenton, representing herself, sued the City over alleged sexual harassment and assault in a Queens shelter. The alleged events occurred in Long Island City, Queens County.

The Southern District of New York found that both it and the Eastern District of New York were proper venues, but that the Eastern District was more convenient because the events, witnesses, and documents were likely located there.

Judge Swain ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of New York. The court did not decide the underlying allegations, and it left any decision about allowing Kenton to proceed without paying filing fees to the receiving court.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kenton v. The City of New York · No. 1:24-cv-01239
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 28, 2024

Background

Alisha Kenton filed this federal-question action without a lawyer in the Southern District of New York against the City of New York. She alleged that she was sexually harassed and assaulted on May 22, 2021, in an elevator at a “Covid Isolation Shelter” in Long Island City, Queens County.

Venue analysis

The court explained that federal law permits a case to be filed where a defendant resides or where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred. The court determined that the City of New York resides in both the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, making both districts proper venues. The alleged events occurred in Queens County, which is in the Eastern District.

The court also applied the federal transfer statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). That statute allows a court, even when venue is proper, to transfer a case to another proper federal district for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The court concluded that transfer was appropriate because the underlying events occurred in Queens County and relevant documents and witnesses could reasonably be expected to be there.

Ruling

The court directed the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. It stated that the receiving court would decide whether Kenton could proceed without prepaying filing fees. The Southern District did not issue a summons and closed the action in that court. It also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal after certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The court restricted electronic access to Kenton’s filing-fee application because it disclosed the full name of a minor child, contrary to the rule requiring a minor child to be identified by initials.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.