Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 11, 2024

Pearson v. Kryolan Corporation

Judge
Ona Wang
Docket
1:23-cv-05838
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Pearson v. Kryolan Corporation, Judge Wang found the settlement fair and reasonable and directed the Clerk to close the case.

Who this affects

The parties to the proposed settlement—Timothy Pearson, Kryolan Corporation, and Claudia Longo—and the status of the case.

What happened

Pearson v. Kryolan Corporation concerned a proposed settlement submitted by the parties. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

The court reviewed the settlement submissions after a settlement conference held on December 20, 2023. It also reviewed the parties’ filing identified as ECF 28.

Judge Wang found the proposed settlement fair and reasonable and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pearson v. Kryolan Corporation · No. 1:23-cv-05838
Judge
Ona Wang
Date
Mar. 11, 2024

Background

The parties submitted a proposed settlement for court review. The opinion does not state what claims or disputes the settlement resolved.

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the settlement submissions under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., a decision requiring review of certain employment settlements. The court also considered the settlement conference held on December 20, 2023, and reviewed ECF 28. It found the proposed settlement fair and reasonable.

Disposition

The court directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims on their merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.