Griffith v. Southeast Grand Street Guild
- Laura Swain
- 1:24-cv-01281
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Griffith v. Southeast Grand Street Guild, Judge Swain ordered the plaintiffs to pay fees or submit corrected applications to proceed without prepayment.
Loretta Griffith/Loretta Hudson and Calvin Hudson, who must either pay the required fees or submit separate, complete, signed amended applications within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.
What happened
In Griffith v. Southeast Grand Street Guild, Loretta Griffith/Loretta Hudson and Calvin Hudson filed the case without lawyers and submitted applications asking to proceed without paying court fees upfront.
The court found that the applications did not provide enough separate, signed, and complete financial information for each plaintiff. It ordered each plaintiff, within 30 days, either to pay $405 or submit a corrected application; no summons will issue yet.
If the plaintiffs do not comply, the case will be dismissed. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also determined that an appeal from this order would not qualify for fee-free appeal status.
The detailed version
- Griffith v. Southeast Grand Street Guild · No. 1:24-cv-01281
- Laura Swain
- Mar. 14, 2024
Background
Loretta Griffith/Loretta Hudson and Calvin Hudson brought this action without lawyers. The plaintiffs submitted two applications to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called applications to proceed in forma pauperis, or IFP applications.
Court’s analysis
The court could not determine whether either plaintiff was unable to pay the required $405 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee. The applications did not clearly show that each plaintiff had signed his or her own application, contained identical information without identifying whose information was provided, and did not state when the plaintiffs were last employed. The plaintiffs also reported no income, money, or assets and answered “No” or “N/A” to questions about paying living expenses, dependents, debts, and other financial obligations. The court found that the applications did not fully explain how the plaintiffs paid their living expenses.
Order
The court ordered that, within 30 days of March 14, 2024, the plaintiffs must either pay the $405 in fees or each submit an amended IFP application. Each amended application must answer all relevant questions, provide facts showing that the individual plaintiff cannot pay the fees, identify docket number 24-CV-01281 (LTS), and be signed by that plaintiff. If the court grants the amended applications, the plaintiffs may proceed without prepaying fees.
No summons will issue at this time. If the plaintiffs comply, the clerk’s office will process the case under its usual procedures; if they do not comply within the allowed period, the action will be dismissed. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.