Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 25, 2024

Ortega v. Hodge

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-00204
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ortega v. Hodge, Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice after Ortega failed to submit required fee paperwork or pay filing fees.

Who this affects

Christopher Ortega’s action against Hodge and the other named defendants was dismissed without prejudice because Ortega did not submit the required fee-related documents or pay the filing fees. The court also denied permission to proceed without paying fees on appeal.

What happened

In Ortega v. Hodge, the court had ordered Christopher Ortega to submit an application to proceed without paying filing fees, along with a required prisoner authorization, or to pay the $405 filing fee.

The court had warned that failing to comply within 30 days would result in dismissal. Ortega did not submit the required documents or pay the fee.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action without prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment. She also denied Ortega permission to proceed without paying fees on appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ortega v. Hodge · No. 1:24-cv-00204
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 25, 2024

Background

On January 11, 2024, the court ordered Christopher Ortega to do one of two things within 30 days: submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees, together with a required prisoner authorization, or pay the $405 in fees required to file a civil action. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Court’s Ruling

Ortega did not submit the application and authorization or pay the required fees. The court therefore dismissed the action without prejudice. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment dismissing the action.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The opinion does not address the merits of Ortega’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.