Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 28, 2024

CUNNINGHAM v. SILVERSTEIN PROPERTIES-INC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-02342
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Cunningham v. Silverstein Properties-Inc., Judge Swain dismissed Benjamin Cunningham’s action without prejudice for filing without required court permission.

Who this affects

Benjamin Cunningham’s lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice; the opinion does not resolve his allegations against Silverstein Properties-Inc. or the other defendants.

What happened

Cunningham v. Silverstein Properties-Inc. concerned Benjamin Cunningham’s new lawsuit, which he originally filed without a lawyer in New Jersey before it was transferred to the Southern District of New York. He alleged that he was detained for trespass while accompanying a process server and was given a trespass notice.

A 2016 court order barred Cunningham from filing additional papers or lawsuits without the court’s permission. The opinion also describes later filing restrictions, but Cunningham had not asked for permission to bring this action.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because Cunningham did not comply with the 2016 order. She also denied permission to proceed without paying fees on appeal, certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
CUNNINGHAM v. SILVERSTEIN PROPERTIES-INC · No. 1:24-cv-02342
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 28, 2024

Background

Benjamin Cunningham filed this action without a lawyer in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. That court transferred the action to the Southern District of New York. Cunningham alleged that, on November 9, 2020, he was detained for trespass while accompanying a process server who was attempting to serve a summons and complaint on the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey. He also alleged that he received a “fake trespass notice.”

Prior filing restrictions

The opinion states that, on August 2, 2016, District Judge Deborah A. Batts entered an order barring Cunningham from filing any additional papers or lawsuits without permission of the court because of his “unauthorized, repetitive, and frivolous litigation.” The opinion also identifies later filing restrictions imposed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Southern District of New York. It says that Cunningham did not seek permission to file this action.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 because Cunningham failed to comply with the August 2, 2016 order. The dismissal was based on the filing restriction; the opinion did not decide the merits of Cunningham’s allegations about detention or the trespass notice.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.