Torres v. Sher Tremonte LLP
- Laura Swain
- 1:24-cv-02087
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Torres v. Sher Tremonte LLP, Judge Swain transferred Torres’s RICO action to New Jersey because the dispute centers there.
Jose O. Torres and the defendants he sued are affected because the action was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the District of New Jersey. The receiving court will decide whether Torres may proceed without prepaying filing fees.
What happened
Torres v. Sher Tremonte LLP concerns Jose O. Torres’s lawsuit under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. Torres, who is detained in New Jersey and is representing himself, sued a law firm and several individuals over events connected to his federal criminal case in New Jersey.
The court decided that New Jersey was the more appropriate place for the case. Torres’s claims arose from his New Jersey criminal case, and he had filed a substantially similar lawsuit there involving many of the same defendants. The court also noted that Torres resides in Newark, New Jersey.
The court transferred the action to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey under a federal convenience-and-justice statute. Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk to transfer the case, said the New Jersey court would decide whether Torres could proceed without paying filing fees, and denied fee-free status for any appeal.
The detailed version
- Torres v. Sher Tremonte LLP · No. 1:24-cv-02087
- Laura Swain
- Apr. 1, 2024
Background
Jose O. Torres filed this action without a lawyer under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly called RICO. The opinion states that Torres was detained at the Essex County Jail in Newark, New Jersey, and that his claims arose from a criminal matter in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. He sued Sher Tremonte LLP; Justin Sher; Michael Tremonte; Noam Korati Biale; Kimo Peluso; and Anna Maria Estevao.
Why the Court Transferred the Case
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), a federal district court may transfer a case for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The court explained that it has broad discretion to make that decision and may order a transfer on its own initiative.
The court found transfer appropriate because Torres’s claims arose from his New Jersey criminal case. The opinion also states that Torres resides in Newark, New Jersey, and had filed a substantially similar civil action in the District of New Jersey involving the same facts and many of the same defendants. The court therefore treated the District of New Jersey as the favored forum, citing the general preference for the court where a similar case was filed first.
Ruling and Effect
The court transferred the action under Section 1404(a) to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The Clerk of Court was directed to carry out the transfer. The court stated that the transferee court—the court receiving the case—would decide whether Torres could proceed without prepaying fees. A summons was not to issue from the Southern District of New York, and the order closed the case there.
The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Torres permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.