Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 3, 2024

Williams v. IRS Exam Department

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-02415
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Williams v. IRS Exam Department, Judge Swain transferred Michael O. Williams’s case to the Eastern District of New York based on venue and convenience.

Who this affects

Michael O. Williams’s case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York; the Eastern District court will decide whether he may proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

Michael O. Williams, representing himself, sued the IRS Exam Department over a 2018 tax assessment and other matters. He filed the case in the Southern District of New York.

The court found that the events occurred in Queens County and Suffolk County, where relevant evidence was likely located. Both counties are in the Eastern District of New York, so the court found that transfer served convenience and the interests of justice.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of New York and closed the case in the Southern District of New York. She also directed that no summons issue and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. IRS Exam Department · No. 1:24-cv-02415
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Apr. 3, 2024

Background

Michael O. Williams, proceeding without a lawyer, brought a federal-question action challenging a 2018 tax assessment and other matters. He named the “IRS Exam Department” as the defendant. The opinion states that Williams resides in Queens County and that the IRS Exam Department is located in Suffolk County.

Transfer analysis

The court discussed the federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391, and the transfer statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Section 1404(a) permits transfer for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The court considered the locations of the underlying events, the parties, witnesses, documents, and other circumstances.

The court concluded that the underlying events occurred in Queens County, where Williams resides, and in Suffolk County, where unnamed IRS officials allegedly committed the wrongful acts and where documentary evidence could likely be found. Because both counties are in the Eastern District of New York, the court found venue proper there and concluded that transfer was in the interest of justice.

Disposition

The Clerk of Court was directed to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The transferee court will decide whether Williams may proceed without prepaying fees. The Southern District court directed that a summons not issue and stated that the order closes the case. It also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order did not decide the merits of Williams’s challenge to the tax assessment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.