Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Apr. 11, 2024

Toure Tawredou v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Judith McCarthy
Docket
7:23-cv-06245
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social Security
In one sentence

In Toure Tawredou v. Commissioner, Judge McCarthy ordered reversal and a sentence-four remand for further Social Security proceedings, including a hearing and new decision.

Who this affects

Toure Tawredou and the Commissioner of Social Security; the case returns to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings, including an opportunity for a hearing and a new decision.

What happened

In Toure Tawredou v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court addressed the plaintiff’s challenge to a Social Security decision. The opinion does not explain the underlying facts or the specific arguments.

The court reversed the action and remanded it to the Commissioner of Social Security under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The remand includes an opportunity for a hearing and a new decision.

Judge Judith McCarthy is identified in the case information. The judgment is dated April 11, 2024, and states that the ruling was based on a stipulation and order dated that same day.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Toure Tawredou v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 7:23-cv-06245
Judge
Judith McCarthy
Date
Apr. 11, 2024

Ruling

The court reversed the action and remanded it to the Commissioner of Social Security under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A sentence-four remand sends the case back to the agency for further proceedings after the court reverses the agency’s decision. The judgment specifies that the proceedings include an opportunity for a hearing and a new decision.

Basis for the Ruling

The judgment says the ruling was made for the reasons stated in a stipulation and order dated April 11, 2024. That stipulation and order is not included in the provided opinion text, so the specific reason for the reversal and remand cannot be determined here.

Disposition

The action was reversed and remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings. The judgment cites Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.