Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 19, 2024

Mt. Hawley Insurance Company v. First Street Ocean Grille, LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:23-cv-01198
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Mt. Hawley Insurance Company v. First Street Ocean Grille, LLC, Judge Caproni dismissed the case after an agreement in principle, with prejudice and without costs.

Who this affects

Mt. Hawley Insurance Company and First Street Ocean Grille, LLC; the case was closed subject to the order’s 30-day provisions.

What happened

Mt. Hawley Insurance Company v. First Street Ocean Grille, LLC ended after the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues.

The court canceled scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs—including attorneys’ fees—and directed the Clerk to close the case and terminate open motions.

Judge Valerie Caproni allowed the parties 30 days to seek reopening for good cause. They could also ask the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce their settlement by submitting the agreement and a specific request within that period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mt. Hawley Insurance Company v. First Street Ocean Grille, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-01198
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Apr. 19, 2024

Background

The parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues.

Ruling

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Possible Reopening and Settlement Enforcement

Within 30 days, the parties could apply to reopen the case by showing good cause for keeping it open in light of their settlement. Requests filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause could be denied on that basis. If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce their settlement agreement, they were required within the same 30-day period to submit the agreement under Rule 7.A of the court’s Individual Practices and request an order expressly retaining jurisdiction.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.