Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 23, 2024

Holmes v. Torres

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-03062
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Holmes v. Torres, Judge Swain ordered Alexander Holmes to correct his prisoner authorization or pay filing fees within 30 days.

Who this affects

Alexander Holmes, an incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, must correct his prisoner authorization or pay the required fees to continue the action.

What happened

In Holmes v. Torres, Alexander Holmes, who is incarcerated and representing himself, submitted an application to proceed without paying court fees upfront and a prisoner authorization. The authorization directed payments to the wrong federal court because the case had been transferred to the Southern District of New York.

The court ordered Holmes to pay $405 or submit the attached authorization, labeled with this case’s docket number, within 30 days. No summons will be issued yet, and the case will be processed if he complies; if he does not, the action will be dismissed.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying appeal fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Holmes v. Torres · No. 1:24-cv-03062
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Apr. 23, 2024

Background

Alexander Holmes, who is incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility and is proceeding without a lawyer, filed this civil action. The Northern District of New York transferred the action to the Southern District of New York. Holmes submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization, but the authorization directed deductions from his prison account to the Northern District of New York rather than to this court.

Court’s Order

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or submit the required materials to request permission to proceed without prepayment. If the court grants that request, the $350 filing fee is collected through installments from the prisoner’s account. The $55 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepayment.

The court ordered Holmes, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $405 or to complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization. The authorization must identify docket number 24-CV-3062 (LTS). No summons will issue at this time. If Holmes complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

Appeal and Prisoner-Status Information

The court certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The court also cautioned that a later dismissal as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim could count as a strike under the prisoner litigation statute. Three strikes can generally prevent a prisoner from proceeding without prepaying fees in future federal civil actions, unless the prisoner faces imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.