McCarthy v. Kaplan
- Laura Swain
- 1:23-cv-11324
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In McCarthy v. Kaplan, Judge Swain transferred the case to Brooklyn’s federal court without deciding the claims.
Ana McCarthy’s case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The transfer affects the defendants and any further proceedings, but the order did not decide the underlying claims.
What happened
McCarthy v. Kaplan is a case brought by Ana McCarthy, who is representing herself, over alleged violations of her minor daughter’s rights in Brooklyn and Israel. McCarthy filed the case in the Southern District of New York and identified defendants with addresses in Brooklyn and elsewhere, while not providing addresses for some defendants.
The court said the Eastern District of New York was a proper and more convenient location because several defendants reside in Brooklyn and some events occurred there. The court also expected relevant witnesses and documents to be located there.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of New York. The order did not decide whether McCarthy’s claims were valid. The Southern District court also said the receiving court would decide whether she could continue without paying filing fees, and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.
The detailed version
- McCarthy v. Kaplan · No. 1:23-cv-11324
- Laura Swain
- Apr. 25, 2024
Background
Ana McCarthy brought this case while representing herself. She invoked the court’s authority over disputes between citizens of different states and alleged that the defendants violated her minor daughter’s rights in Brooklyn, New York, and Israel. The opinion identifies David Kaplan, Gabriel Clague, Samantha Clague, Henry Grant, Schneur Boaron, Sholom Lishner, Perel Lishner, and Berel Lishner, along with additional defendants identified by “et al.” The opinion states that several defendants reside in Brooklyn, that Gabriel Clague is asserted to live in Denver, Colorado, and that McCarthy did not know or provide addresses for some defendants.
Venue analysis
Venue is the federal district where a lawsuit may properly proceed. The court explained that the law generally permits a civil case to be filed where all defendants reside in the same state and district, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in some circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority.
The court said it was unclear whether venue was proper in the Southern District of New York based on where the defendants reside because McCarthy did not plead every defendant’s residence. But it concluded that venue was clearly proper in the Eastern District of New York because several defendants reside in Brooklyn, which is in Kings County and within that district, and because part of the alleged conduct occurred there.
The court also applied the federal transfer statute, which allows a court to move a case to another proper district for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. It found that transfer was appropriate because the underlying events occurred in Brooklyn, McCarthy resides there, several defendants reside there, and many relevant documents and witnesses could be located there.
Ruling and effect
The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The Clerk was directed to make the transfer, and a summons was not to issue from the Southern District of New York. The order closed the case in that court; it did not decide the merits of McCarthy’s allegations.
The order left to the Eastern District court the question whether McCarthy could proceed without prepaying fees. It also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order on April 25, 2024.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.