Lee v. Jaddou
- Analisa Torres
- 1:23-cv-04478
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Lee v. Jaddou, Judge Torres dismissed Lee’s claims without prejudice after he failed to serve the defendant.
David Lee’s action was dismissed without prejudice because he did not serve the defendant or respond to the order to show cause. The ruling did not resolve the merits of his naturalization-related claims.
What happened
In Lee v. Jaddou, David Lee, representing himself, sought review of the denial of his naturalization application and related relief. The court ordered him to serve the summons and complaint within 90 days.
Lee did not file proof that he served the defendant by the deadline. After two extensions, he also did not respond to an order asking why the case should not be dismissed.
Judge Torres found no clear error in Judge Moses’s recommendation and adopted it in full. The court dismissed Lee’s claims without prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.
The detailed version
- Lee v. Jaddou · No. 1:23-cv-04478
- Analisa Torres
- Apr. 26, 2024
Background
David Lee filed the action without a lawyer, seeking judicial review of the denial of his naturalization application and related relief. The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons and ordered Lee to serve the summons and complaint on the defendant within 90 days. The summons was issued on June 29, 2023, making September 27, 2023, the service deadline.
The court later referred the case to Judge Barbara C. Moses for general pretrial management. Because the court had not received proof of service, Judge Moses extended Lee’s deadline to file a certificate of service twice. Lee did not meet those deadlines. Judge Moses then ordered him to explain why the case should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), which governs the time for serving a summons and complaint. Lee did not respond or file proof of service.
Recommendation and Review
Judge Moses issued a Report and Recommendation recommending dismissal without prejudice under Rule 4(m). Lee was notified that he could object, but he filed no objections. Because there were no objections, Judge Torres reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.
Ruling
Judge Torres adopted Judge Moses’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The court dismissed Lee’s claims without prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment consistent with the order and the recommendation. The opinion did not decide whether Lee was entitled to review of the denial of his naturalization application.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.